<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little on E-notarization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://esignaturepost.com/2008/07/16/a-little-on-e-notarization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://esignaturepost.com/2008/07/16/a-little-on-e-notarization/</link>
	<description>Yet another Electronic Signature weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 03:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://esignaturepost.com/2008/07/16/a-little-on-e-notarization/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ambrose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esignature.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital signatures are generally a component of electronic signatures. Some states require digital certificates and sanction/certify certain CAs.  However generally electronic signatures 
do not have to be digital signatures, Colorado&#039;s method relies on state issued journals.  The post &lt;a href=&quot;http://esignaturepost.com/2009/06/03/state-government-electronic-signature-guidelines/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;State Government Electronic Signature Guidelines&lt;/a&gt; discusses these.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital signatures are generally a component of electronic signatures. Some states require digital certificates and sanction/certify certain CAs.  However generally electronic signatures<br />
do not have to be digital signatures, Colorado&#8217;s method relies on state issued journals.  The post <a href="http://esignaturepost.com/2009/06/03/state-government-electronic-signature-guidelines/" rel="nofollow">State Government Electronic Signature Guidelines</a> discusses these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worktoday24</title>
		<link>http://esignaturepost.com/2008/07/16/a-little-on-e-notarization/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[worktoday24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esignature.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When u mentioned electronically sign the signatures, are they the same as digital signatures?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.APOSTILE.US&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Apostile &lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When u mentioned electronically sign the signatures, are they the same as digital signatures?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.APOSTILE.US" rel="nofollow"> Apostile </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

