Why is Industry So Slow to Adopt?

December 19, 2007

Many of us in the esignature community are somewhat mystified by the slowness of industry to adopt electronic signatures. The ROI is demonstrated and generally accepted to be quite high for many documents, with improved productivity, reduced errors, more rapid processing, improved customer satisfaction and many other benefits. So it is remarkable that the government is leading the way ahead of many respected, world class companies in the private sector. The IRS has been willing to accept electronic tax filings from most individuals since 1998 and now receives over half of it filings electronically.

The Department of Education processes 14 million Financial Aid applications a year and is seeing significant growth in the electronic applications. They claim that none of the electronically signed applications has ever been contested. There is a nice presentation on the Department of Education’s roll-out from the ESRA Conference last month here.

An interesting opinion of Education’s authors:

Implementation will not be constrained by the technology or legal issues. It is constrained by the business side and its ability to handle the process re-engineering and the organizational willingness to change issues.

I guess it means that the Department of Education is more willing to change than most of our Fortune 100 institutions. Does this seem to match your experience?


XML Signature Page is up

December 14, 2007

The XML page is up to talk about this important technology: XML Electronic Signatures
Also – thanks for the ideas on structuring this site. I will be trying to incorporate things such as the XML technology PDF on static pages and possibly move to a static page for an entry. The blog will be used for updates on new technologies and depoloyment.
I am looking for co-contributors, anyone interested?


E-Signature Technology pages are going up

December 12, 2007

I’ve finished the first of the E-Signature technology pages, the beginning of a terminology primer, and hope to add more this week. I will be publishing technology pages geared at the intelligent lay person, as a practitioner it is more important that we carefully and correctly implement these technologies with widely available tools than that we have a deep understanding of the extremely complex mathematics associated with PKI cryptosystems.

Let’s get some discussion going here, I know that many people have greater insights than I and look forward to having you share your insights!


The best form of electronic document for signing

December 3, 2007

When you first decide to add signed electronic documents to your workflow the tendency is to want to sign the document in the native format of the creating application. So people often think that they want to sign Microsoft Office files, emails and CAD files. However there are several considerations when it comes to actually deploying the system.

What are retention requirements? If these signed documents need to be accessible in 10 years is the Word document format an appropriate format for archive?

Who will be signing the documents, and where? The availability of viewing tools is critical, as the document will need to be viewed electronically.

These considerations often cause the direction to turn to standard formats for archive. One format that has become very popular in electronic document archiving is the TIFF standard, largely due to its origins in the scanning and archiving of paper documents. TIFF is readily viewable using many applications and has proven to be a durable specification, as has its cousin in the imaging world, JPEG. These documents are easily signed and displayed. Indexing and storing requires using metadata tags as these documents are not inherently searchable.

Text documents have significant advantages for indexing and searching, but raw text lacks the formatting and images that are critical parts of most modern documents.

HTML and XHTML are gaining in popularity. The problem to date has been using restrictions to insure that the document is consistently rendered by the multitude of applications that display HTML.

The newest standard to gain favor is the Portable Document Format (PDF). This specification, developed and popularized by Adobe through its Acrobat family of products, is based on widely adopted Postscript page description language with extensions to support embedding fonts and other information useful to make a truly portable, device independent document format. Adobe released the PDF specifications and the rights to use them royalty free, although Adobe still owns copyrights. They also worked together with the ISO, AIIM and NPES to create the PDF/A format for long term document retention. The PDF references are available from Adobe here, and the PDF/A specification is available from the ISO. More information on PDF/A can be found at the PDF/A Competence Center.

In practice we have found that many organizations are migrating to the PDF standard, for multiple reasons. Native PDF has several advantages over image formats, in that PDFs are readily indexed and searched. However the biggest advantage is the ubiquitous and free Acrobat Reader. The prevalence of this application insures that nearly everyone that looks at a PDF document will see the exact same document. Other important features are the strong document-centric format and integrated support for digital signatures and X.509 digital certificates.

In the future we will have a section on methods for developing esignatures for PDF documents.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.